Orders 147968

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1
Avoiding Mixed Methods Research: Leveraging the Embedded Methods and
Paradigm Arguments
Students Name
Institution Affiliation
Course Number/Date
Lecturer’s Name
Due Date
2
Avoiding Mixed Methods Research: Leveraging the Embedded Methods and
Paradigm Arguments
Academics frequently encounter the crossroads of selecting among diverse research
methodologies, encompassing the realm of mixed methods research (MMR). While MMR
seamlessly blends both qualitative and quantitative approaches, it’s prudent to weigh situations
where opting for MMR might not be the most fitting course of action (Molina-Azorin & Fetters,
2020). Two convincing rationales, the embedded techniques argument and the paradigmatic
stance argument, offer insights into why researchers might lean towards evading the utilization
of MMR under certain circumstances.
The Embedded Methods Argument:
The embedded techniques argument posits that amalgamating divergent research
paradigms within a solitary study could potentially water down the depth of analysis and
comprehension. MMR demands proficiency in both qualitative and quantitative methodologies,
potentially thinning out resources across multifarious dimensions (McMillan, 2018). This could
potentially give rise to a scenario where neither qualitative nor quantitative data attain the full
profundity of exploration they inherently deserve. Segregating these paradigms empowers
researchers to engage in more concentrated, specialized analyses, thereby ushering in m …
Purchase document to see full attachment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Orders 147968
From as Little as $13/Page